The Companies (Amendments) Ordinance 2018 will enter into force as of 1 March 2018, under which companies in Hong Kong are required to keep and maintain a significant controllers register (“SCR”), either in English or Chinese, for inspection by competent authorities upon demand. The Companies Registry has published a “Guideline on the Keeping of Significant Controllers Registers by Companies” (the “Guideline”) with detailed guidance on the new requirements in relation to the SCR (the “SCR requirements”).

All companies incorporated and registered in Hong Kong (except companies listed on the Stock Exchange of Hong Kong) should maintain a SCR, containing (i) the required particulars of a company’s significant controller(s) and (ii) name and contact details of a designated representative. Companies not incorporated in Hong Kong (including ‘registered non-Hong Kong companies’ as defined under the Companies Ordinance, Cap.622) are not required to maintain a SCR.

Our legal update highlights certain key SCR requirements and lists out certain key actions to be taken by Hong Kong companies (more operational details are set out in the Guideline):

The conclusions of the consultation (the “Consultation Conclusions”) on review of the position of the Growth Enterprise Market (“GEM”) and changes to the GEM and Main Board Listing Rules (collectively, the “Listing Rules”) was published on 15 December 2017. Having considered the views of respondents, The Stock Exchange of Hong Kong decided to adopt substantially all the proposed amendments to the Listing Rules.

The revised rules took effect from 15 February 2018.  In this legal update, we provide a summary of the changes and revised rules made under the Consultation Conclusions:

Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing Limited (HKEX) and The Stock Exchange of Hong Kong Limited (the Exchange) on Friday, 15 December 2017, announced the conclusions to the New Board Concept Paper (Concept Paper) published on 16 June 2017.

On the same day,  the consultation conclusions on the Consultation Paper on the Review of the Growth Enterprise Market (GEM) and Changes to the GEM and Main Board Listing Rules (GEM Consultation Paper) were also published.

Together, these would bring new important changes to Hong Kong’s listing regime, especially including measures to facilitate listings of companies from emerging and innovative sectors, and aimed to enhance Hong Kong’s competitiveness as a global financial centre.

As announced by the Exchange on its official website:

The Exchange has determined to proceed to expand the existing listing regime by introducing two new chapters to the Main Board Listing Rules to allow the listing of (i) Biotech issuers which are pre-profit / pre-revenue; and (ii) issuers from emerging and innovative sectors that have weighted voting rights (WVR) structures, subject to additional disclosure and safeguards.

Companies with WVR structures would be required to have a minimum expected market capitalisation of $10 billion and, if below $40 billion of market capitalisation, would need to meet a higher revenue test of $1 billion in the full financial year before listing. Pre-revenue companies listing under the new Biotech chapter would be required to have a minimum expected market capitalisation of $1.5 billion.

Detailed proposed amendments to the existing Listing Rules for the implementation of the changes are expected to be available for consultation in the first quarter of 2018, with anticipation to have the market ready by second half of 2018 for more innovative companies choose Hong Kong as listing destination.

HKEX’s official news release contains further information on the proposals and way forward.

On 30 November 2017 the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission (“SFC”) announced that an agreement has been reached with China Securities Regulatory Commission (“CSRC”) on proposals to introduce an investor identification model for Northbound trading under the Mainland – Hong Kong Stock Connect[1] (“Investor ID Model”).  Hong Kong Exchange and Clearing Limited (“HKEX”) also published an Information Paper, a circular, a FAQ and had arranged a Briefing to Participants on Northbound Investor ID Model.

In the SFC announcement, it was expressed that the Investor ID Model is critical to safeguard market integrity and to strengthen the protection of investors in both markets, and that the SFC also aims to implement an investor identification regime to cover all trading on the SEHK in the longer term.

This Legal Update is intended to shed some light on the key features of Investor ID Model with a particular focus on its implications on asset management companies:

For more operational details of the Investor ID Model please refer to HKEX’s Information Paper and FAQ. [1] Shanghai-Hong Kong Stock Connect and Shenzhen-Hong Kong Stock Connect, both provide for mutual stock market access between Hong Kong and the Mainland.

 [1] Shanghai-Hong Kong Stock Connect and Shenzhen-Hong Kong Stock Connect, both provide for mutual stock market access between Hong Kong and the Mainland.

On 23 June 2017, the Securities and Futures Commission of Hong Kong (the “SFC”) issued the “Circular to clarify competence requirements for existing licensed persons intending to provide asset management services” (the “Circular”), with an aim to provide further guidance on how the SFC assesses the competence of a corporation or a responsible officer (“RO”) to carry on asset management activities.

The Circular focuses on the eligibility criteria for licensed persons to be approved to carry out Type 9 regulated activity of asset management with respect to industry experience that may be relevant and acceptable, and also on the conditions for seeking exemptions from passing the required local regulatory papers.

As the title of the Circular suggests, it is directed to existing licensed persons that may consider expanding their scope of business into asset management.  In a press release on the Circular, the SFC’s expresses that it welcomes existing licensees to broaden their business scope in light of the growth in Hong Kong’s asset management industry.

The Circular also emphasizes that the SFC will consider each application for exemption based on the specific circumstances of each case and that interested firms are encourage to approach the SFC to discuss their proposed business plans.

The Circular can be seen as the SFC’s effort to inform the industry that the SFC will continue to take a pragmatic approach in considering licensing applications, and spells the SFC’s intention to encourage existing licensed entities to apply to engage in Type 9 regulated activity of asset management as a stand-alone business, to spur further growth of Hong Kong’s asset management industry.

Considering the mention of the broader industry experience that the SFC would take into account including investment research, private equity and proprietary trading, as well as industry experience in other recognized local or overseas markets, the Circular also suggests the SFC’s welcome attitude for qualified and experienced investment professionals around the globe to seek to be licensed in Hong Kong to engage in asset management.

For details, please refer to our firm’s publication:

香港证监会(“证监会”)于2017年6月23日发布《关于厘清与有意提供资产管理服务的现有持牌人有关的胜任能力规定的通函》(“《通函》”)，就证监会对法团和负责人员进行资产管理活动的胜任能力的评估提供进一步指引。

《通函》主要说明持牌人获批准进行第9类（提供资产管理）受规管活动的有关行业经验是否可能相关及被接受方面的资格标准，以及可豁免通过本地监管架构考试的条件。

如《通函》的标题所指出，《通函》是针对可能考虑将业务范围扩展到资产管理的现有持牌人。在有关《通函》的新闻发布中，证监会表示鉴于香港资产管理行业的增长，该会欢迎现有持牌人扩展其业务范围。

《通函》亦强调证监会将就个案特别情况考虑每个豁免申请，亦欢迎有兴趣的机构与证监会讨论其拟定的业务计划。

《通函》体现证监会希望告知行业该会将继续采取务实方式考虑发牌申请，亦说明证监会有意鼓励现有持牌人申请第九类（提供资产管理）牌照作为一项独立的业务，以进一步开拓香港资产管理行业。

考虑到《通函》提及的证监会将会顾及到的范围更广泛的行业经验，包括投资研究、私募股权投资、自营交易及在其他认可的本地或海外市场的行业经验等，《通函》亦反映了证监会对全球合资格和有经验的专业人士在香港申请牌照参与资产管理业务所持的欢迎态度。

详情请参阅本所刊物：

On 5 May 2017 the Securities and Futures Commission (“SFC”) issued the ‘Consultation Paper on the Proposed Guidelines on Online Distribution and Advisory Platforms’ (“Proposed Guidelines”).

In view of the increasing use of electronic distribution channels, the use of algorithms to construct investment portfolios and to provide investment advice(e.g. automated portfolio construction or model portfolios based on a client’s personal circumstances) (commonly referred to as “robo-advice”), SFC issued the Proposed Guidelines to (1) provide guidance and control on the design and operation of online platforms; (2) clarify how suitability requirements would be triggered in terms of online trading; and (3) provide additional safeguard proposed for the sale of complex products on online platforms on an unsolicited basis.

The Proposed Guidelines will be applicable to all SFC licensed or registered persons when conducting their regulated activities in providing order execution, distribution and advisory (including discretionary and automated) services in respect of investment products via online platforms (“Platform Operators”).

We would urge asset management companies to take a closer look to the Proposed Guidelines and provide necessary feedback before the end of the consultation period (4 August 2017) since there is a growing trend for fund houses to develop their own trading platform, and provision of robo-advice. These activities will be caught under the Proposed Guidelines. It would also be helpful to be aware of these requirements when fund houses select distributors and assess whether they are compliant with such requirements.  Lastly, fund houses may wish to take a closer look at the proposed definition of ‘Complex Products’ as set out in the Proposed Guidelines as this will likely impact fund distribution and product design.

Here’s our Legal Update on the Proposed Guidelines under consultation: